Socialism could be fun…?

Olga Kravets, Bilkent University
a reconstructed living room
Having a keen interest in both everyday life and GDR (well, actually in the socialist past), I visited the “Dictatorship and Everyday Life in the GDR” exhibition while in Berlin in April 2007 (the exhibition is on until July, 29). Set up by the German Historical Museum, the exhibition aims to show “How the citizens of the GDR succeed in coping with their everyday life.” [link: Scroll down for Panoramic Pictures] The collection spreads across two floors and is arranged in themes – work and retirement policy, education and family policy, for example. The life of GDR citizens is represented largely through the official insignia, such as party membership cards, school/work uniforms, birth/school/pension certificates, work records, newspapers, posters and so on. There are also a few typical ‘resistance’ items such as blue jeans, The Beatles records, and some bohemian art pieces. While the exhibition is impressive in its size and organization, I was disappointed. For me, such artifacts relate to the ideology (dictatorship) aspect i.e. the structuring of everyday lives, but do not necessarily tell much of what that everyday life was like. They certainly do not provide any insight into the question of “How did the citizens of the GDR succeed in coping with their everyday life?”
Leaving the exhibition, I was wondering if it was at all possible to present in a museum format “state and dictatorship, on the one hand, and strategies of daily life, on the other.” After all, “strategies of daily life” are meant to be enacted…
But then, I just happened to be passing by a sign inviting to a “GDR Museum Berlin.” It turned out to be a private museum, located across the Palast der Republik, the now-half-demolished, former house of the East German parliament. Opened sometime in 2006, the museum aspires to offer “a hands-on experience of everyday life in the GDR.” Like the German Historical Museum “Dictatorship…” exhibition, the museum collection is organized thematically. Namely, the museum has displays on family, work, education, culture, fashion, housing, holidays and consumption in the GDR. While the museum’s concerns and themes are overlapping with those of the “Dictatorship…” exhibition, its display could not be more different. Two points of difference are particularly noteworthy. First, there are hardly any glass showcases, rather the display is an arrangement of a smaller scale concrete-slab apartment block buildings, the ubiquitous symbols of the socialist past still standing in parts of the former socialist countries.
starting a “Trabi
The windows and parts of the buildings can be open to reveal school notes, camping gear, fashion magazines, shopping lists, kitchen utensils, bottles of cleaners, clothing, movie tickets, and a variety of other things. Visitors are encouraged to touch, play with, sit on, listen to, smell, etc. (and they sure do – see photos).
Second, the museum collection consists mainly of the mundane objects once used by East Germans. The artifacts on display are so ordinary that the curators are compelled to remind visitors that ‘the toilet paper is a museum exhibit, please do not remove.’ The ordinariness of the artifacts is further emphasized through the arrangement of the items with the reference to an individual’s life stages and private experiences such as birth, school years, marriage, childbirth, etc. rather than a historical timeline. Thus, the nature of artifacts along with the way they are presented makes these objects appear devoid of the immediate ideological loading that was readily apparent in the artifacts dominating the “Dictatorship…” exhibition. The museum addresses this issue in a straight forward fashion. It features a little Stasi corner, a miniature Berlin Wall and numerous slogans on its red walls. Perhaps more interestingly, the museum frames (sometimes literally) the tension between the daily life and ideology, the lived socialism and the proscribed one, in exhibits themselves. For instance, the set of baby clothes is overplayed with the charts of the party-planned and the actual birth rates in the country. Then, the display of camping gear and photos of nude beaches is juxtaposed to the map of places the East Germans were allowed to travel to. The examples of such juxtapositions are many.
While the museum treats its subject matter with respect and seriousness, it does have a Disney-ish feel to it. Firstly, in contrast to official (state) exhibitions, this museum is not shy about presenting GDR as a spectacle, an entertainment, a market(ing) offering for tourists’ consumption i.e. essentially about making GDR a commodity or at least using it as a brand that sells. At the exit the visitors are offered an extensive collection of the GDR merchandise and there is also a café where they can try some East German treats.
Secondly, the GDR museum is about entertainment first, and about education…afterwards. History is (made) fun here. There is no explicit commentary or particular path for visitors to follow. Rather they discover for themselves the museum’s script by locating artifacts partly hidden in the drawers in the maze of socialist apartment blocks. The artifacts are not labeled and/or described individually, but organized in themes to be experienced. For example, with headphones in a Stasi corner, visitors can eavesdrop on people exploring the recreated GDR living room in the other section of the museum. Other experiences include starting a Trabant auto, trying a garment from a wardrobe, learning dance moves while listening to the East German pop hits, watching a GDR fashion show or a party parade, playing a game of soccer for a winning East German team, to name a few.
work in GDR
In this way, to use a cliche, history is made exciting and accessible to many (and one does see kids and young people enjoying the museum)… Of course, at this point the critics of the museum and its approach might exclaim “what (kind of) history!?” And, I do not have an answer to that but I’d note that despite the Disney-ish feel (which, I understood, was supposed to make me uneasy), I liked the museum. I was pleasantly surprised at the playful and lively atmosphere in a museum talking about the socialist past; this is a notable departure from the way the socialist life is usually discussed and presented. Besides, in my view, this tiny private museum gives a better insight into “How the citizens of the GDR succeeded in coping with their everyday life?” than the “Dictatorship…” exhibition or a permanent display on GDR at the German Historical Museum, for that matter. The museum’s extensive collection of mundane objects suggests that the citizens of the GDR ‘coped’ by engaging in very ordinary daily activities so familiar to people anywhere – they studied for exams and danced at discotheques, cleaned their flats and cooked dinners, used contraceptives and watched soccer on TV…and yes, there were party parades. But, it is these routines of daily human living that possibly made the socialist life with all its politics and ideology bearable. Academically speaking there is nothing new in this, but it is a refreshing message to hear from an exhibition devoted to the socialist past.

  • 1. Brochure for the “Dictatorship and Everyday Life in the GDR” (March 30 – July 29 2007; From the Collections of the German Historical Museum)

  • 2. Brochure for the “GDR Museum Berlin: a hands-on experience of history” (permanent exhibition)

[Click to read more for additional photos]

growing up in GDR
idyllic travel gear and a map of allowed destinations
sporting heroes and doping
listening to the GDR pop tunes
clothing in GDR
clothing in GDR

Download PDF

3 Responses to Socialism could be fun…?

  1. Ruth Mandel UCL Anthropology June 27, 2007 at 7:21 am #

    These museums reflect a larger tendency in Germany, from the Goodbye Lenin film, to many other iterations of n’Ostalgie (e.g., see the work of Daphne Berdahl).
    Anyone who spends any time in Germany, particularly Berlin, knows that the psycho-socio-cultural effects of unification are still palpable. Given this, one thing that strikes me as particularly intriguing is the way, in light of the massive buy-out/acquisition of east germany, west germany basically decimated the social structures, symbols, values, etc., yet for some reason has appropriated and
    re-installed is the beloved ampelmann (have a look: )
    So, now, more brightly than ever, Ampelmänner assist pedestrians crossing
    the street while recalling east german pedestrian (in both senses)
    symbols. Moreover, there is even an entire shop now in eastern berlin devoted
    to selling kitsch ampelmann artifacts: part of the continuing neo-commodification
    of communism.

  2. Razvan Nicolescu, UCL, MA in Material and Visual Culture October 7, 2007 at 4:50 pm #

    Exposure of everyday life during the communist period could be refreshing. It is obviously one perspective that misses almost completely in Romania, as it seems that the post-communist society mark, and the self-awareness of such, determine somehow the main institutions and organisations that “represents” the civil society to present almost insistently a rather dark aspect of the communist period, namely the atrocities that happened in the early-communist prisons. Such places are intended to represent both remembering places and to pay respect to the anti-communist heroes. Speaking beyond their aesthetics and meaning, we can discuss about an inflation of such spaces: throughout almost all important sites in Romania “where something happened” we can now assist to quite a few representations of that “terror”…
    As reflected in the article, everyday life expos change the accent from the terror of supporting a totalitarian system to the point that people succeeded to constantly live throughout it. Nostalgia plays a central role here. If in Germany terror in general, and the communist one in particular, seems to have been resolved already through political discourse and massive literature and representation, in Romania there is still a need to express it through monuments and memorials; meanwhile any exposure of private life during communism misses almost completely.
    In this context, even if in both countries the communism representation folds between political stake and private initiatives, we cannot notice that on the long way from touristic attractions and souvenirs selling to barb wire, black walls and massive steel monuments, the two states have very different rememorizing strategies in the post-communist era. I am interesting in the mechanisms that drive such different expressions…

  3. Valentina Buonumori MA in Visual and Material Culture candidate October 10, 2007 at 10:43 am #

    Speaking of neo-commodification of communism and about using GDR history and heritage as an entertainment offer for tourists: I don’t know if you have seen the Berlin budget hotel Ostel that offers the ‘real’ GDR experience. A night in the‚ ‘Stasi-suite’ is available for 59 euros while a night and an economy bed in a six-person ‘pioneer camp’ room costs about nine euros. Most furnishings and decorations in this hotel are original, the clocks behind the lobby show the time in Moscow, Berlin, Havana and Beijing and visitors are welcomed with portraits of communist leaders hanging on the walls. In addition the hotel also offers city tours in a Trabant car, the most common GDR-made car.
    While Ostel can be largely seen as a marketing offer that uses GDR memorabilia and design as a way of entertaining tourists, the phenomenon of nostalgia in the ex GDR is a very widespread one. ‘Ostel’ like ‘Ostalgie’ is a play on the German word for east (explored in the film ‘Good Bye Lenin’ etc.). The appropriation of that past though furnishing and objects can be seen here as a way of objectifying memories that have been replaced perhaps too quickly by capitalistic values after the fall of the Berlin wall. The owners of Ostel are now looking into offering a full GDR style holiday in the countryside outside Berlin.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes

%d bloggers like this: